Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 APRIL 2016

Legal Developments In Construction Law: April 2016

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Making sure a contract is finalised and executed is important, but so is knowing with whom you are contracting. Mr Collins entered into an oral agreement for the construction and sale of a residential property on his development site but was it with Fairhurst Developments Limited or Mr Fairhurst, who wholly owned and controlled FDL?

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

1. When making a contract can get personal

Making sure a contract is finalised and executed is important, but so is knowing with whom you are contracting. Mr Collins entered into an oral agreement for the construction and sale of a residential property on his development site but was it with Fairhurst Developments Limited or Mr Fairhurst, who wholly owned and controlled FDL? FDL was VAT registered, whereas Mr Fairhurst was not; it had its own bank account and the judge was satisfied that the project was always intended to be, and was, undertaken by FDL, as FDL ordered and paid for all plant and materials (other than those obtained through the builder's merchant) and the subcontract packages and labour. FDL also obtained finance for the works and reclaimed VAT on the supplies, and payments were made by Mr Collins through his company and his partner, to FDL. Mr Fairhurst had not, however, always conducted his development projects through FDL and Mr Collins claimed that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from