Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2025

Jaevee Homes v Fincham: WhatsApp Users Take Note!

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Jaevee Homes Ltd v Fincham (t/a Fincham Demolition) [2025] EWHC 942 (TCC) is one of those useful, multi-faceted cases that considers issues that are not only of interest to construction practitioners...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Summary

This article contains links which are only accessible by PLC subscribers.

In this Insight, first published in PLC, Anna Blest and Katharine Tulloch consider the decision in Jaevee Homes Ltd v Fincham (t/a Fincham Demolition) [2025] EWHC 942 (TCC), in which the court concluded, among other things, that informal WhatsApp messages and e-mails between the parties constituted a binding construction contract.

Jaevee Homes Ltd v Fincham (t/a Fincham Demolition) [2025] EWHC 942 (TCC) is one of those useful, multi-faceted cases that considers issues that are not only of interest to construction practitioners but also to anyone who enters into a contract.

For construction practitioners, it provides a useful reminder about the implication of the payment elements of the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/649) (Scheme for Construction Contracts) and how to determine whether a payment notice is valid for the purposes

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from