Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 OCTOBER 2013

Implied Terms And Variations In Construction Contracts – Issues Arising From Recent Case Law

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

Implied terms in construction contracts (or lack of) and instructions to vary works can cause problems for developers carrying out construction works.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Implied terms in construction contracts (or lack of) and instructions to vary works can cause problems for developers carrying out construction works. These issues were considered in two recent cases: Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Limited v Higgins Construction Plc and MT Højgaard A/S v E.On Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd.1

Implied terms

The Aspect v Higgins case confirmed the difficulty that parties will face in seeking to persuade the courts to imply terms into construction contracts (and indeed contracts generally).  Higgins had engaged Aspect to carry out a survey of an estate in Hounslow. Higgins started an adjudication some four years after asbestos was found, alleging that Aspect had failed to pick up the presence of asbestos. The adjudicator found in Higgins' favour and Aspect paid £658,017.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from