Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2024

Dennis vs Southwark: A Warning On Amending Planning Permissions In Phased Developments

Thomson Snell & Passmore
Thomson Snell & Passmore
Contributor
Thomson Snell & Passmore

Thomson Snell & Passmore

With roots going back to 1570, Thomson Snell & Passmore has been honoured by the Guinness World...

View firm profile
Explore more from Thomson Snell & Passmore

Judgment was handed down yesterday in the High Court, in favour of council tenant and housing campaigner, Aysen Dennis, in her case against the London Borough of Southwark.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Judgment was handed down yesterday in the High Court, in favour of council tenant and housing campaigner, Aysen Dennis, in her case against the London Borough of Southwark. Ms Dennis is a long-time resident of the Aylesbury Estate, which has been undergoing significant redevelopment since 2015. She challenged Southwark Council's decision to allow housing provider Notting Hill Genesis to amend a planning permission, making it easier to push through changes to the original 'masterplan', without applying for new planning permission.

What is the background to Dennis vs Southwark?

The Aylesbury Estate dates back to the 1960s. In 2010 Southwark Council put forward a 'masterplan' to redevelop the site over a 20 year period, to increase the number of houses and flats, which would accommodate a mixture of social and private housing.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from