Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2016

Consents To Assign – One Wrong Invalidates Two Rights

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

The High Court decision in No.1 West India Quay Ltd v. East Tower Apartments Ltd is a stark reminder to both landlords and tenants of the need to be aware of and to comply with the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The High Court decision in No.1 West India Quay (Residential) Ltd v. East Tower Apartments Ltd [2016] EWHC 2438 (Ch) is a stark reminder to both landlords and tenants of the need to be aware of and to comply with the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 (1988 Act) when dealing with applications to assign where landlord's consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

Background

East Tower Apartments Ltd (Tenant) held 42 long leases of flats in a residential tower block at West India Quay. In 2015 the Tenant made a number of applications to its landlord, No. 1 West India Quay (Residential) Ltd (Landlord) for consent to assign some of its leases.

The leases were all drafted on substantially the same terms. Those terms included a requirement for landlord's consent to assignments. As the leases stipulated that the landlord's consent could not be unreasonably withheld the provisions of section 1 of the 1988 Act applied.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from