Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Concurrent Delay – What Is The Right Test?

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

Even relatively simple construction projects regularly suffer a whole host of delays to activities.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Even relatively simple construction projects regularly suffer a whole host of delays to activities. For complex projects, the interface between delays to various sequences of works - and establishing which activity is the cause of critical delay (i.e. actually causes delay to project completion) - is extremely complex. Identifying which issues are critical requires sophisticated expert delay analysis and detailed input from factual witnesses. Invariably, this is an expensive - and time consuming - process.

In English law, it is generally accepted that, where a project suffers from a period of "concurrent delay", the contractor is entitled to an extension of time (such that the employer is not entitled to claim liquidated damages). However, the contractor is not entitled to recover from the employer its prolongation costs. However, as demonstrated by the recent judgment in Thomas Barnes v Blackburn, the meaning of "concurrent delay" may be more open to debate.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from