Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2010

Adjudication: Jurisdiction and Severability

Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Norton Rose Fulbright

In the following case, the court refused to enforce a decision of the adjudicator on the grounds that the adjudicator made a material jurisdictional error in deliberately declining to consider the employer’s set -off defence; and that the deliberate decision amounted to a breach of natural justice.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Christopher Hill
Christopher Hill
Steve Abraham
Steve Abraham
Donald Warnock
Donald Warnock

In the following case, the court refused to enforce a decision of the adjudicator on the grounds that the adjudicator made a material jurisdictional error in deliberately declining to consider the employer's set -off defence; and that the deliberate decision amounted to a breach of natural justice.

Pilon Limited v Breyer Group plc [2010] EWHC 837 (TCC)

The employer engaged a contractor to carry out refurbishment work on a redevelopment project in Ealing. The work was divided into two separate sections, batches 1-25 and batches 26-62.

Disputes arose between the parties and the contractor left the site in October 2008. In January 2009 the contractor entered into a company voluntary arrangement. Nine months later in September 2009 the contractor issued a payment application in respect of batches 26-62. Adjudication proceedings followed with the adjudication notice expressly limiting the claim to batches 26-62.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from