Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2013

Adjudication And The ECHR

The Court of Session has ruled that in certain circumstances an adjudicator's award may be successfully challenged if it breaches a party's right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under Article 1 Protocol 1 ("A1P1") of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR").

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The Court of Session has ruled that in certain circumstances an adjudicator's award may be successfully challenged if it breaches a party's right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under Article 1 Protocol 1 ("A1P1") of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR").  The case is Whyte & Mackay Ltd v. Blyth & Blyth Consulting Engineers Ltd, reported here.

Facts

Blyth & Blyth ("B&B") was engaged by Whyte and Mackay ("W&M") as engineers in respect of a new bottling plant facility in Grangemouth. Following completion of the works a dispute arose in connection with the foundations, which W&M alleged were defective. The dispute was referred to adjudication on 2 March 2012. The adjudicator issued his decision on 9 April 2012 and awarded W&M almost £3 million pounds in damages. W&M sought to enforce the adjudicator's award in the Court of Session. B&B resisted enforcement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from