Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

What Constitutes "Meaningful Information" About Automated Decision-Making?

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

Advocate General's opinion in Case C-203/22 emphasizes controllers' duty to provide clear, meaningful explanations of automated decision-making logic under GDPR, balancing data subjects' rights with trade secret protections.

United KingdomPrivacy

Have you ever asked yourself this question? Probably you have if you are a controller using automated decision-making (including profiling) and you have had to respond to data subject access requests (DSARs).

Where automated decision-making is within scope of a DSAR, the controller must provide meaningful information about the context of the automated decision-making, including the logic involved as well as the significance and consequences of the decision. The processing leading to automated decisions is technical and often complex, but as noted in regulatory guidance on automated decision-making and profiling, "complexity is no excuse for failing to provide information to the data subject".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from