Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

UK Data Protection Consent: State Of Mind Is Irrelevant—does This Change Practice?

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The UK Court of Appeal has clarified the test for valid consent under GDPR, ruling that an objective approach should be taken rather than examining an individual's subjective state of mind. This decision has significant implications for how data controllers assess consent from vulnerable individuals, particularly in sectors like online gambling where addiction concerns arise.

United KingdomPrivacy

On August 4, 2026, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) updated its guidance on consent to the processing of personal data. This update was made to account for the Court of Appeal’s RTM v. Bonne Terre and Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 488 decision regarding valid consent. The case considered consent in the context of vulnerable individuals, and we look at it in more detail below.

Specifically, the ICO guidance notes that data protection law does not require a controller to determine the state of mind of an individual giving consent and that consent may still be valid, even if the controller knew of a particular vulnerability of the individual. The key is whether the individual is legally capable of giving an objective indication of consent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from