Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2026

White v Uber London Ltd: A Challenge To Funded Litigation Privilege

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

The High Court's decision in White v Uber London Ltd has sent shockwaves through the litigation funding industry by ruling that communications between litigation funders and solicitors regarding funding decisions are not protected by litigation privilege. This judgment challenges the widely-held market assumption that such correspondence enjoys privilege protection, potentially making litigants more cautious about approaching funders and requiring parties to be more deliberate about what they include in ear

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Litigation funders would be forgiven for thinking that the headwinds created in the last few years were dissipating. The decision of the Supreme Court in PACCAR had clearly tested the industry, as had the failure of successive governments to follow through with promises to legislate to correct its impact, but reforms announced by the government in December 2025 suggest that a reversal is imminent, together with a lighter level of regulation for the industry than commentators had predicted.

However, it appears that the headwinds might not be completely over.

White v Uber London Ltd

In White v Uber London Ltd, the High Court held on 12 June 2026 that communications relating to litigation funding were not subject to litigation privilege (contrary to the view widely held by the market). As a result, litigants may be more cautious before approaching litigation funders for funding.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from