Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2011

Timed Out - The Cost Of Delay

The recent case of Simon Ross -v- Giles Insurance Brokers Limited yet again highlights the risks of failing to pursue a claim without delay.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent case of Simon Ross -v- Giles Insurance Brokers Limited yet again highlights the risks of failing to pursue a claim without delay.

The Facts

The case concerned a claim for commission, mileage and profit share by Mr Ross against his former employers, Giles Insurance Brokers Limited ("GIBL"). The action was raised in September 2002. Various sundry and abortive procedures occurred, and, in October 2005, a hearing on the evidence was allowed, with dates to be fixed.  Nothing was fixed. The case lay dormant until November 2010, when Mr Ross sought to revive it by asking the court to fix trial dates. 

The Arguments

GIBL sought to have the case disposed of, arguing their defence was prejudiced as a result of Mr Ross's delay in progressing the action. In particular, they were no longer able to access their email system; they had difficulty in locating records; some of their key witnesses could no longer be traced; and of those witnesses who were available,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from