Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2017

Third Parties Who Funded 'Opportunistic' Claim Liable For Indemnity Costs

The Court of Appeal has upheld a judge's order imposing indemnity costs on third-party funders.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Tim Hardy
Tim Hardy
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson

The Court of Appeal has upheld a judge's order imposing indemnity costs on third-party funders.

In Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc & Others [2016] EWCA Civ 1144, the claimant used commercial third-party funding to pursue a claim of US$1.65 billion, including claims for breach of contract, business torts, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. The latter claims included allegations of personal dishonesty against a representative of one defendant. The claim was not only unsuccessful, but was characterised by the first-instance judge as "speculative and opportunistic", "objectively hopeless" and "based on no sound foundation in fact or law". The judge found that to a large extent, the facts and matters which led to the defeat of the action were known to the claimant before commencing the proceedings, which he said were an "elaborate and artificial construct" rooted in misrepresentations. He ordered the claimant to pay indemnity costs and, when the claimant

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from