Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 NOVEMBER 2013

Silence Is Costly: Consequences Of Ignoring An Invitation To Mediate

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in the case of PGF II SA v OMFS CO 1 Ltd, providing strong guidance on the duty to take part in alternative dispute resolution.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Nick Goldstone
Nick Goldstone

On 23 October 2013, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of PGF II SA v OMFS CO 1 Ltd, providing strong guidance on the duty to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

Background to the case

PGF, the landlord, filed a dilapidations claim against OMFS, the tenant, for £1.9 million, in respect of commercial office premises in London.  OMFS denied liability entirely.  Trial was scheduled for 11 January 2012.

In April 2011, PGF made a Part 36 offer to settle, at £1.25m.  At the same time, OMFS also made a Part 36 offer to settle, at £700,000.

In July 2011, PGF invited OMFS to mediate the matter.  This invitation was re-iterated on 1 October.  The invitations were ignored.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from