Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2009

Sigma Finance & Pari Passu Wins The Day

The Supreme Court has not allowed a clause in a Security Trust Deed dealing with the distribution of assets in Sigma Finance Corporation (Sigma) between "experienced commercial operators advised by expert lawyers" to permit the preferential distribution of certain assets.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Guy Pendell
Guy Pendell
Kushal Gandhi
Kushal Gandhi

Introduction

The Supreme Court has not allowed a clause in a Security Trust Deed dealing with the distribution of assets in Sigma Finance Corporation (Sigma) between "experienced commercial operators advised by expert lawyers" to permit the preferential distribution of certain assets.

Facts

Sigma was a structured investment vehicle that raised funds primarily by issuing or guaranteeing medium term notes. The funds so raised were invested in acquiring amongst other things, asset-backed securities. Like many of its peers, Sigma was a victim of the current financial crisis.

Some of Sigma's liabilities were secured pursuant to a Security Trust Deed which provided, upon the occurrence of an enforcement event, a 60-day "realisation period" during which time the Security Trustee was obliged to organise Sigma's assets into a "short-term pool" to cover short-term liabilities and "long-term pools" to cover long-term liabilities. However, a clause in the Security Trust

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from