Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Pre-action Disclosure: No Jurisdiction To Hear Application Where Respondent And Documents Both Located Abroad

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

The High Court has held that it had no jurisdiction to permit an application for pre-action disclosure to be served on a respondent outside England and Wales in respect of documents held outside the jurisdiction...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court has held that it had no jurisdiction to permit an application for pre-action disclosure to be served on a respondent outside England and Wales in respect of documents held outside the jurisdiction: Ebert v Ferrari S.p.A [2026] EWHC 2279 (TCC).

The decision contrasts with Gorbachev v Guriev [2022] EWCA Civ 1270 (considered here) in which the Court of Appeal permitted an application for third party disclosure to be served on a respondent outside the jurisdiction, in circumstances where the documents sought were located in England. The court in the present case distinguished that decision, noting that it had expressly left open the question of the court's jurisdiction where the documents, as well as the respondent, were held abroad.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from