Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2022

How Not To Prepare Witness Evidence: A Cautionary Tale

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

In a recently published decision in Greencastle MM LLP v Payne and Ors, the High Court has struck out a large portion of a party's witness evidence for non-compliance with Practice Direction 57AC.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recently published decision in Greencastle MM LLP v Payne and Ors, the High Court has struck out a large portion of a party's witness evidence for non-compliance with Practice Direction 57AC.  This decision stands as a warning to litigants and demonstrates that the Court will not shy away from exercising its powers under paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 of the Practice Direction.

Practice Direction 57AC

Practice Direction 57AC came into force nearly a year ago on 6 April 2021, outlining strict requirements relating to witness statements prepared for a "final trial hearing" in the Business and Property Courts.  In particular, the Practice Direction prohibits such witness statements from providing a narrative for documents or commentary on other evidence in the case.  It also stipulates that witness statements must only contain matters of fact of which the witness has personal knowledge and that these facts should be explained in the witnesses own words (rather than

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from