The article analyzes the reach of the precedent-setting case of
Hasbro Inc. v. European Union Intellectual Property Office
(EUIPO), which centered on whether the practice of
"evergreening" – the refiling of identical
trademarks – can constitute an act of "bad faith."
In a ruling released in April 2021, the EU General Court determined
that Hasbro acted in bad faith through repeat filings for
the MONOPOLY trademark because the board game conglomerate's
intention was to avoid showing genuine use of the mark.
The Hasbro dispute originated before the EUIPO's
Cancellation Division, where the case was initially rejected. On
appeal, the EUIPO Board of Appeal partially invalidated
Hasbro's EU registered trademark for MONOPOLY, which
was the verdict upheld in the General Court's ruling. A key
factor underlying the General Court's decision was
Hasbro's admission that one of its motivations for
refiling was to avoid incurring potential costs to prove genuine
use of the mark.