Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2014

When Is A Trade Mark Not A Trade Mark?

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

A registered trade mark should not be descriptive of the characteristic of the particular goods or service for which it is registered. But where is the line drawn between what is descriptive and what is not?

United KingdomIntellectual Property

A registered trade mark should not be descriptive of the characteristic of the particular goods or service for which it is registered. But where is the line drawn between what is descriptive and what is not?

A very recent decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court regarding the JUMPSTAR trade mark has (among other matters) helpfully summarised the principles to be applied in a trade mark case to the question of descriptiveness.

In very short form, a couple of the highlights are as follows. It is the objective of the law to ensure that a sign descriptive of a characteristic of the goods or service must be free to be used by all traders of such good or service. A characteristic has been held by the Court to be a property of the goods or service which is easily recognisable by the relevant consumer. It doesn't matter that the mark may have other meanings, if one of its meanings is descriptive, that will be enough.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from