Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JUNE 2025

UPC Claim Construction: Exemplified Embodiment Is Not Restricting

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

In a decision on the merits handed down by the Paris Central Division of the UPC (UPC_CFI_230/2024), Ballinno's European patent No. EP 1944067 B1 was revoked.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

In a decision on the merits handed down by the Paris Central Division of the UPC (UPC_CFI_230/2024), Ballinno's European patent No. EP 1944067 B1 was revoked. The description of the patent in suit related to a method and system for determining an offside situation in a game of football.

The central point of contention in this decision focussed on the interpretation of the two independent claims, directed respectively to a method and system "for detecting a contact with a ball by a first player in games and sports". In their interpretation, the panel noted that the claims were not limited in their construction to application in football or offside detection. Thus, although the description of the patent exemplified the method and system in the context of an offside situation in football, the Court held that the generalised wording of the claims took precedence over this exemplified embodiment. The claims were therefore broadly construed such that the method and system

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from