Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JANUARY 2013

The Informed User Can Have An Imperfect Recollection

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

The Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has recently confirmed that, when comparing the overall impression of a Community design with an earlier trade mark, the informed user may sometimes have an imperfect recollection.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Neuman v Jose Manuel Baena Grupo SA (C-101/11 P and C-102/11 P)

The Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has recently confirmed that, when comparing the overall impression of a Community design with an earlier trade mark, the informed user may sometimes have an imperfect recollection.

History

This dispute started when Baena applied to register the following as a registered Community design (the "Design"):

Neuman applied to invalidate the Design on the basis of the following earlier Community trade mark registration (the "Trade Mark"):

The Cancellation Division of OHIM declared the Design invalid on the basis that it used a previous distinctive sign (Article 25(1)(e) of the Community Design Regulation 6/2002). The Board of Appeal subsequently declared the Design invalid for lacking individual character and not conveying a different overall impression from the earlier Trade Mark (Article 25(1)(b) of the Community Design Regulation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from