Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2013

Omnipharm v Merial – Winner Gets It Spot-On

In a recent case, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales upheld a first instance decision to revoke one of Merial’s patents on grounds of insufficiency.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Elizabeth Guy
Elizabeth Guy
Anand Varu
Anand Varu

In Omnipharm Limited v Merial [2013] EWCA Civ 2, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (CA) upheld a first instance decision to revoke one of Merial's patents on grounds of insufficiency. The CA also dismissed Merial's appeal against an order to pay 40% of Omnipharm's costs and awarded costs to Merial in relation to applications made for preserving Omnipharm's security for costs.

The patents in question were EP 0,881,881 (the '881) and GB 2,317,564 (the '564), which related to "spot-on" formulations of parasiticide fipronil for protecting animals against ticks and fleas.

Background

Prior to the action Omnipharm had requested acknowledgements of non-infringement from Merial in relation to four fipronil spot-on formulations. No acknowledgements were forthcoming and Omnipharm commenced proceedings to revoke the patents on grounds of obviousness and insufficiency and to secure declarations of non-infringement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from