Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2017

G1/15: Partial Priority For A Generic Claim Less Limited By Clearly Defined Alternatives

The Enlarged Board of Appeal answered the question in the negative, holding that partial priority may not be refused in such situations.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

On 1st February 2017, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office issued its long-awaited decision in case G1/15 clarifying that entitlement to partial priority is not to be refused where a claim encompasses alternative subject-matters, each having their own effective date, using one or more generic expressions.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal were responding to a referral in case T 0557/13 from the Technical Boards of Appeal which asked the question: "Where a claim of a European patent application or patent encompasses alternative subject-matters by virtue of one or more generic expressions or otherwise (generic "OR"-claim), may entitlement to partial priority be refused under the EPC for that claim in respect of alternative subject-matter disclosed (in an enabling manner) for the first time, directly, or at least implicitly, and unambiguously, in the priority document?"

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from