Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2025

BVG v EUIPO: A Sound Mark Judgment That Resonates Beyond Melody

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

On 10 September 2025, the General Court of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T‑288/24 – BVG v EUIPO that merits close attention from trade mark practitioners and also brand owners.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

On 10 September 2025, the General Court of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T‑288/24 – BVG v EUIPO that merits close attention from trade mark practitioners and also brand owners. The Court annulled the EUIPO's refusal to register a sound, namely a short jingle of Berlin's public transport operator, Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), for use on their buses, confirming that brevity and simplicity are not, in themselves, grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(b) of the EUTMR.

Listen to the jingle that BVG applied for here.

This decision offers a clarifying lens through which to view the concept of distinctive character, particularly in relation to signs often dismissed as "banal."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from