Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2016

Arbitration And Mediation – An Alternative To Litigation?

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

The press is often filled with stories of high-profile IP litigation, but it is rare to hear of IP cases that have been through alternative means of dispute resolution (ADR) such as arbitration or mediation.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The press is often filled with stories of high-profile IP litigation, but it is rare to hear of IP cases that have been through alternative means of dispute resolution (ADR) such as arbitration or mediation. This is for good reason – most ADR is completely confidential. ADR can be used in almost any legal dispute at any stage of a dispute – in fact, UK litigants have a positive obligation to consider whether ADR would be more suitable for resolution of the dispute than proceeding through the courts. But how and when should it be used in IP matters?

For the uninitiated, parties who engage in ADR choose one or more basic forms. Arbitration is where the parties agree to be bound by the decision of an arbitrator, typically a retired judge or other person with legal and/or technical expertise. It is "trial-like" in the sense that the parties agree a set of procedural rules, but with greater flexibility compared to court litigation, and the arbitrator presides over the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from