Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2010

Weekly Update A Summary Of Recent Developments In Insurance, Reinsurance And Litigation Law - 40/10

The defendants sought to adduce evidence of exchanges between the parties made during without prejudice negotiations and before a settlement agreement was concluded, because those exchanges were said to be relevant to the proper interpretation of the settlement agreement.

United KingdomInsurance

This Week's Caselaw

Oceanbulk Shipping v TMT Asia Ltd & Ors

Admissibility of without prejudice negotiations to interpret the terms of a settlement agreement

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2010/44.html

The defendants sought to adduce evidence of exchanges between the parties made during without prejudice negotiations and before a settlement agreement was concluded, because those exchanges were said to be relevant to the proper interpretation of the settlement agreement. At first instance (Weekly Update 28/09) the judge held that the evidence was admissible.

The Court of Appeal (by a 2:1 majority) overturned that decision (Weekly Update 7/10). The Supreme Court has now unanimously held that the evidence is admissible. The House of Lords in Chartbrook v Persimmon Homes [2009] (Weekly Update 24/09) accepted that it may be possible to admit evidence of prior communications between the parties as part of the background which may throw light on what they meant

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from