Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2007

Reinsurance: Follow The Settlement Clauses

In a recent case the English High Court endorsed the benefit and good sense that a market settlement afforded reinsureds and reinsurers alike. The Court granted summary judgment in favour of a reinsured against a reinsurer permitting it to recover paid claims under back-to-back reinsurance.

United KingdomInsurance
Stephen Netherway
Stephen Netherway
Kate Tregidgo
Kate Tregidgo

In a recent case the English High Court endorsed the benefit and good sense that a market settlement afforded reinsureds and reinsurers alike. The Court granted summary judgment in favour of a reinsured against a reinsurer permitting it to recover paid claims under back-to-back reinsurance. The underlying settlement which the reinsurer was requested to follow also comprised a settlement of future claims (including IBNR) as well as past and pending claims: summary judgment for amounts in respect of future claims including IBNR claims was not entered for the reinsured.

In summary English & American (E&A) entered into a settlement with its insured and sought in turn to recover a proportion of that settlement from Axa under back-to-back reinsurance. Axa refused to indemnify E&A, arguing that it was not required to follow the settlement because it was an interim good faith payment without admission of liability on a WP basis, under a full reservation of rights, and that there was no

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from