Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 FEBRUARY 2013

Insurance And Reinsurance - 29 January, 2013

A summary of the most recent updates and caselaw developments in re(insurance).

United KingdomInsurance

McManus & Ors v European Risk Insurance Co

Whether insurer was entitled to reject a "blanket notification" under a claims-made policy

The claimant firm of solicitors took over another firm of solicitors ("SF") – a firm which predominantly carried out conveyancing work – in June 2011. It was insured under a professional indemnity policy (which incepted on 1 October 2011) by the defendant. That policy was a claims-made policy, requiring notification when the insured first became aware of circumstances (meaning "an incident, occurrence, fact, matter, act or omission which may give rise to a claim" against the insured). One month after inception of the policy, the claimant received a claim from a former lender client of SF alleging breaches of contract and tort arising out of a mortgage transaction (for which the claimant, as the successor of SF, might be liable). This claim was notified to the insurer (and the notification was accepted as being valid). Thereafter, a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from