Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2021

Separation Agreements And TUVs

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

Sheridan, a bankrupt, met Ms Song in 1999. They subsequently had children and married. Sheridan was the sole wage earner.

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Sheridan, a bankrupt, met Ms Song in 1999. They subsequently had children and married. Sheridan was the sole wage earner. They acquired a property in July 2007; it was held in the sole name of the bankrupt although both Sheridan and Song asserted that it was jointly owned.

The marriage broke down in March 2012 and the property was subsequently sold. Ms Song saw a solicitor and entered into a Separation Agreement with Sheridan in March 2012. It was agreed that Song would receive 80% of the net proceeds of sale from the property (c. £430,000) in order to purchase a home for herself and their children. 

It became apparent that 80% of the proceeds of sale would be insufficient and the bankrupt agreed to provide a further £40,000. Song borrowed additional sums to fund the purchase from family. The purchase of the new property was completed on 11 May 2012 and that property was owned in her sole name. Sheridan and Ms Song divorced in 2015; she did not apply for ancillary

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from