Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2019

Terrorism Insured – A German View

Clyde & Co
Explore more from Clyde & Co

After September 11th 2001, German insurers excluded terrorism risks from the standard insurance coverage in particular under property insurances as well as under business interruption insurances.

United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Henning Schaloske
Henning Schaloske
Christina Thiele
Christina Thiele
Author LinkedIn connections

After September 11th 2001, German insurers excluded terrorism risks from the standard insurance coverage in particular under property insurances as well as under business interruption insurances. However, they developed a new approach: to the extent of a total sum insured of EUR 25 million, the insurers offer to include coverage for terrorism risks. If the total sum insured exceeds EUR 25 million, insurance coverage for terrorism risks may only be obtained from the specialist insurer EXTREMUS. In this context, two major issues are in the centre of our practice: contractual exclusion of terrorism risks, and providing suitable insurance of terrorism risks.

1. Contractual exclusion of terrorism risks

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

Budget Tracker (2026)

The Chancellor of the Exchequer faces the formidable challenge of delivering his first Budget amid economic headwinds, geopolitical instability, and a wave of ambitious government promises. With GDP growth forecast at just 1.1%, inflation at 3.4%, and public sector net borrowing exceeding £115 billion, can he balance fiscal responsibility with pledges to avoid raising Income Tax, National Insurance, or VAT while funding increased defence spending and social care reforms?
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Travers Smith LLP
Travers Smith LLP
Article

Sanctions: Fortnightly Summary

The UK government has significantly expanded its sanctions framework targeting Russia, introducing measures against individuals and entities involved in military supply chains, energy sectors, cryptocurrency networks, and alleged human rights violations. These developments reflect an evolving enforcement landscape with new powers, increased scrutiny of sanctions evasion, and landmark legal clarifications affecting businesses operating in sanctioned jurisdictions.
European UnionGovernment, Public Sector
BCL Solicitors LLP
BCL Solicitors LLP
Article

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) And National Security Screening

Angela Gregson of Weightmans and Sean Ryan of Whitney Moore compare Ireland's new foreign direct investment screening regime with the UK's established National Security and Investment Act, examining when notification is required, key procedural differences, and practical steps to navigate both frameworks. The analysis draws on recent annual reports to reveal how these regimes are operating in practice and what reforms are on the horizon.
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
Weightmans LLP
Weightmans LLP
Article

Peptides In Aesthetics And Wellness: The Regulatory And Criminal Risks Practitioners Need To Know

The aesthetics and wellness markets are seeing explosive growth in peptide treatments, but many practitioners may not fully understand the complex regulatory framework governing these products. What begins as offering an innovative treatment could escalate into criminal investigations, frozen bank accounts, and asset forfeiture proceedings under proceeds of crime legislation.
United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector
JMW Solicitors LLP
JMW Solicitors LLP