Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2026

DAMLs And DATFs: Navigating UK Sanctions And AML/CTF Risk

HFW
HFW
Contributor
HFW

HFW

HFW is a sector-focused law firm with people who have a real passion for the sectors they work in,...

View firm profile
Explore more from HFW

UK businesses operating in complex markets face overlapping obligations under sanctions, anti-money laundering, and counter-terrorist financing frameworks. When should a company seek formal defence from the National Crime Agency before proceeding with a payment, and what are the critical differences between DAML and DATF mechanisms?

United KingdomGovernment, Public Sector

Sanctions compliance is currently at the forefront of the regulatory agenda for many businesses operating in complex or conflict-affected markets. However, parallel sets of obligations, under the UK’s anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) frameworks, must not be overlooked. Where a transaction raises sanctions concerns, it can also engage obligations under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) and the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT). In certain circumstances, a business may need to seek a formal “defence” from the UK Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU) within the National Crime Agency (NCA) before proceeding with a payment or transaction.

This briefing explains the circumstances in which a Defence Against Money Laundering (DAML) or a Defence Against Terrorist Financing (DATF) may be required, the critical differences between the two mechanisms, and how sanctions exposure can trigger these obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from