Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2015

Deed Of Variation – Getting It Wrong

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

The case of Vaughan-Jones v Vaughan-Jones illustrates two ways to get a deed of variation badly wrong.

United KingdomFamily and Matrimonial

The case of Vaughan-Jones v Vaughan-Jones illustrates two ways to get a deed of variation badly wrong.

Mr Vaughan-Jones died in October 2007. In his Will he appointed one of his three sons and his accountant as executors. He divided residue into four equal shares between his sons and widow which gave rise to an inheritance tax liability.

Approximately five days before the second anniversary of his death, the professional executor and family all executed a deed of variation redirecting residue to the widow absolutely. The evidence given was that by entering into the deed of variation the family had all intended that the inheritance tax be eliminated – Mrs Vaughan-Jones as the widow would benefit from spouse exemption on the entire element of the estate passing to her.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from