Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2019

Unionised Workforces & Varying Contractual Terms

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Employers with unionised workforces will welcome the Court of Appeal's judgment in Kostal UK Ltd v Mr D Dunkley and Others in which it held that laws on unlawful inducement

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Employers with unionised workforces will welcome the Court of Appeal's judgment in Kostal UK Ltd v Mr D Dunkley and Others in which it held that laws on unlawful inducement relating to collective bargaining do not give trade unions a veto over any changes being agreed directly with the workforce.

Here we consider the first Court of Appeal judgment on just what is and is not within the scope of the unlawful inducement statutory provisions and what this means for employers with unionised workforces.

Lawful variation or unlawful inducement?

If the source of a contractual employment term is a collective agreement with a trade union, then the obvious mechanism for change will be to seek the trade union's agreement to that change. Where the trade union's agreement to the proposed change cannot be reached, is it possible to seek agreement directly from the employees?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from