Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2012

The Identification Of Pensionable Pay

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

It seems surprising that issues still arise over what part of an employee's earnings are pensionable.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

It seems surprising that issues still arise over what part of an employee's earnings are pensionable. However the recent Court of Appeal case discussed below, highlights why it is vital that schemes clearly define this term. Carefully defining what part of a member's income is pensionable creates certainty and clarity for the members, the employer and their advisers. In addition this ensures that pension calculations are consistent and that all members are treated fairly.

Singapore Airlines & Anor v Buck Consultants Ltd (13 December 2011)

Singapore Airlines (SA) brought a claim for negligence against Buck Consultants. The claim was in response to the work undertaken in updating the Singapore Airlines Pension and Life Assurance Scheme (the "Scheme") trust deed and rules in 2000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from