Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2013

The IBM Judgment – An Update

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

Following on from our previous article covering the High Court's October 2012 decision in IBM United Kingdom Pensions Trust Limited v IBM United Kingdom Holdings Limited & ors we bring you an update on the latest decision given by Mr Justice Warren on 13 December 2012 of the same name.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Following on from our previous article covering the High Court's October 2012 decision in IBM United Kingdom Pensions Trust Limited v IBM United Kingdom Holdings Limited & ors we bring you an update on the latest decision given by Mr Justice Warren on 13 December 2012 of the same name.

First IBM Case

You will recall that in the October case the IBM Trustee sought correction of various deeds and rules governing the "C Plan", a defined benefit sub-section of the IBM Pension Plan. The IBM Trustee applied for rectification of the 1983 rules in relation to both active and deferred members' rights to retire on an unreduced pension without employer consent from age 60. Warren J granted rectification in respect of the active members but found no intention that the deferred members should enjoy equivalent rights. Therefore, deferred members pensions would only be payable from age 63 unreduced and without employer consent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from