Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2016

State Attorneys General On The Attack Against Noncompete Overuse

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

Too much of a good thing can be bad – a maxim that some employers have historically ignored by requiring entire workforces, including rank-and-file employees, to submit to post-employment...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Too much of a good thing can be bad – a maxim that some employers have historically ignored by requiring entire workforces, including rank-and-file employees, to submit to post-employment noncompete obligations as a condition of continuing employment. In recent months, however, state attorneys general, specifically in New York and Illinois, have put significant heat on employers that have engaged in this practice and, in doing so, appear to be opening a new front in the battle over noncompete agreements. For example:

  • In June, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed a lawsuit against a national sandwich chain, seeking to invalidate form noncompete agreements that indiscriminately applied to all franchise employees, including sandwich makers and delivery persons, and purported to bar them from subsequent employment with competing sandwich shops.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from