Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2023

Risks Of Not Making Reasonable Adjustments

Herrington Carmichael LLP
Herrington Carmichael LLP
Contributor
Herrington Carmichael LLP

Herrington Carmichael LLP

The origins of the practice can be traced back over 180 years in Wokingham and 150 in Aldershot. It...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herrington Carmichael LLP

The case of Tyerman v NHS Digital is another recent case, which demonstrates the onus on employers to consider reasonable adjustments for job applicants.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The case of Tyerman v NHS Digital is another recent case, which demonstrates the onus on employers to consider reasonable adjustments for job applicants. Mr Tyerman, who had been diagnosed with autism, received £20,000 from NHS Digital for their failure to make reasonable adjustments for him during the interview process, after he applied for a role in their cyber security department. NHS Digital argued that they should treat all applicants the same, but this placed Mr Tyerman at a disadvantage due to his disability. NHS Digital also felt that his request to receive questions in advance of the interview was not a reasonable adjustment.

Case facts

Mr Tyerman initially applied for a role in the cyber security department, and was short listed for the job. Due to his autism he struggled to properly communicate, and therefore requested to be able to see the interview questions in advance, and also asked them to avoid open-ended questions which he would have found

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from