Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2018

Misconduct Revisited

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

The cornerstone of the law around dismissal for misconduct is twofold. The reasonableness of a dismissal for misconduct will depend first on the fairness, or otherwise, of the investigation into the alleged ...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The cornerstone of the law around dismissal for misconduct is twofold. The reasonableness of a dismissal for misconduct will depend first on the fairness, or otherwise, of the investigation into the alleged misconduct and secondly on the treatment of that misconduct as a sufficient reason for dismissal. The late 1970s case of British Home Stores v. Burchell remains authority for the proposition that a misconduct dismissal will only be fair if, at the time of the dismissal, the employer believed the employee to be guilty of misconduct; it had reasonable grounds for that belief; and, at the time it held that belief, it had carried out a reasonable investigation. 

In recent months, two misconduct cases have considered whether serious misconduct or a series of acts of misconduct can warrant dismissal. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from