Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2020

July Update – Hill V Lloyds

Employer discriminated against depressed employee by failing to guarantee that she would not have to work with alleged harassers again

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Employer discriminated against depressed employee by failing to guarantee that she would not have to work with alleged harassers again

In this case, the EAT considered whether it would be a reasonable adjustment for an employer to provide an undertaking to a disabled employee guaranteeing a severance package in the event that it could not maintain certain working arrangements. 

What does the law say?

Where an employer's provision, criterion or practice (PCP) places a disabled employee at a substantial disadvantage compared to non-disabled employees, the duty to make reasonable adjustments will arise.  Employers must consider whether an adjustment would lessen the disadvantage and, if it would, whether it is a reasonable step to take in the all the circumstances.  Reasonable adjustments can cover a wide range of possible actions, from adjustments to physical premises (e.g. widening a doorway to allow wheelchair access) to changes to company rules and/or practices

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from