Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2019

Illegal Employment Contracts

Herrington Carmichael LLP
Herrington Carmichael LLP
Contributor
Herrington Carmichael LLP

Herrington Carmichael LLP

The origins of the practice can be traced back over 180 years in Wokingham and 150 in Aldershot. It...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herrington Carmichael LLP

In case of Chikale v Okedina, The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that an illegal contract is not automatically unenforceable.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

In case of Chikale v Okedina, The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that an illegal contract is not automatically unenforceable.

Ms Chikale had been brought to the UK, on a domestic worker visa, by Ms Okedina. Ms Chikale was required to work seven days a week for two years, for which she was paid a total of only £3,300. The Claimant's visa had expired but she continued to work in breach of immigration rules, having been falsely advised by Ms Okedina that the relevant steps were being taken to extend her visa.

Ms Chikale asked for more money and Ms Okedina summarily dismissed her. She then brought claims against the Respondent. Ms Okedina tried to rely on the defence of illegality, arguing that the contract with Ms Chikale was unenforceable from the point at which the visa had expired. The EAT, however, concluded that Ms Chikale was unaware of the fact that she was illegally working and rejected the defence of illegality. MS Okedina appealed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from