Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2026

Home Office Rules Are Not A Blank Cheque For Differences In Pay

Weightmans LLP
Weightmans LLP
Contributor
Weightmans LLP

Weightmans LLP

Weightmans is an award-winning UK law firm, employing more than 1,500 people. The firm has grown...

View firm profile
Explore more from Weightmans LLP

A recent Employment Tribunal decision highlights the risks for employers who pay sponsored overseas workers more than UK-based colleagues doing the same work. The case demonstrates that immigration compliance alone may not justify pay disparities, and employers must be prepared to evidence their rationale and consider less discriminatory alternatives.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

A recent Employment Tribunal decision is a useful warning for employers who sponsor overseas workers, particularly in the care sector.

In G. Gharabli v Cedar Hope Care Services Ltd, the Tribunal considered a pay arrangement under which overseas support workers on Skilled Worker visas were paid £12.31 per hour, while UK-based support workers who did not require sponsorship were paid less. At the relevant time, the claimant was paid £11 per hour, while overseas colleagues in support worker roles remained on £12.31 per hour.

The employer’s explanation was straightforward. Sponsored workers had to be paid at the minimum level required under Home Office rules. The pay difference, it said, reflected the need to comply with immigration rules, not discrimination. It also argued that overseas workers had additional responsibilities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from