Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2010

Employment Briefing - August 2010

In Willoughby v CF Capital plc the EAT found that an attempted retraction of a dismissal by CF Capital plc of Ms Willoughby following discussions with her about changing her employment status was not valid.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Originally published in August 2010

Retraction of Dismissal Only in Exceptional Cases

In Willoughby v CF Capital plc the EAT found that an attempted retraction of a dismissal by CF Capital plc of Ms Willoughby following discussions with her about changing her employment status was not valid.

CF Capital plc had presumed that Ms Willoughby had accepted a move to being self employed and wrote to her confirming this change and terminating her employment. When it realised that Ms Willoughby did not accept the change it explained that there had been a misunderstanding and sought to retract the termination and return to the status quo. Ms Willoughby did not accept the attempted withdrawal of the termination and instead brought proceedings for unfair and wrongful dismissal. At first instance a tribunal found that there were special circumstances (the genuine misunderstanding) which entitled CF Capital to withdraw its termination letter. The EAT disagreed, holding that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from