Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2010

Discrimination - Principal Liable to Contract Worker

In "Leeds City Council v Woodhouse" the claimant worked for a commercial organisation responsible for the management and maintenance of Leeds council housing.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Bird & Bird'S Labour & Employment Group
Bird & Bird'S Labour & Employment Group

In Leeds City Council v Woodhouse the claimant worked for a commercial organisation responsible for the management and maintenance of Leeds council housing.  He alleged that he had been racially abused, to his face and behind his back, by an employee in the council's housing team with whom he had dealings at work.

The Court of Appeal has upheld an EAT decision that Leeds City Council was liable for these acts of racial discrimination and harassment by one of its employees.  In doing so it confirmed the wide application of s.7 of the Race Relations Act, which states that it is unlawful for a principal to discriminate against a contract worker on grounds of race.

In its judgment, the Court of Appeal dealt with the following questions – do contract workers need to be under the principal's managerial power or control in order to bring such a claim directly against them? Should the court ask whether they were treated as employees? Or whether the principal controlled

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from