Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2021

Burden Of Proof In Discrimination Cases

The Supreme Court has agreed with the Court of Appeal and held that the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was incorrect to conclude that there is no initial burden of proof on a claimant in a ...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The Supreme Court has agreed with the Court of Appeal and held that the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was incorrect to conclude that there is no initial burden of proof on a claimant in a discrimination claim in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi.

Mr Efobi is a black African born in Nigeria. He worked as a postman for Royal Mail Group Ltd but attempted, unsuccessfully, on 33 different occasions to secure an IT-related role.  He believed that he had been unsuccessful because of his race and brought a claim for direct race discrimination. 

Around six recruiters and two hiring managers were involved in Mr Efobi's unsuccessful applications, but Royal Mail did not call any of them to give evidence at the tribunal hearing. At first instance the tribunal accepted the evidence of the witnesses Royal Mail did call that the successful candidates all had significantly longer and more relevant experience than Mr Efobi and produced more detailed and relevant CVs.  It held that it

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from