Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2012

Are You Keeping Your Restrictive Covenants Fresh?

This issue was discussed by the High Court in England the recent case of Patsystems Holdings Ltd v Neilly.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

This issue was discussed by the High Court in England the recent case of Patsystems Holdings Ltd v Neilly.

Neilly initially joined Patsystems in 2000 as a junior salesman. He was given a contract including a restrictive covenant preventing him from joining competitor firms for 12 months after termination. Bog standard. On his promotion to Director of Global Accounts in 2005, he was asked to sign a letter recording the promotion, which outlined his new salary etc but stating his terms and conditions were to remain otherwise unchanged.

In 2012 Neilly resigned and told Patsystems that he was joining a competitor firm.  They claimed that he was bound by the restrictive covenant in his original contract and therefore was found to be in breach of contract. They dismissed him.  Patsystems applied to the High Court for an injunction against Neilly, seeking to enforce the restrictive covenant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from