Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2008

Age Discrimination And Enhanced Redundancy Schemes

Two recent decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) provide guidance on what employers must do in order to justify age discrimination

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Two recent decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) provide guidance on what employers must do in order to justify age discrimination

THE AGE REGULATIONS

General

The Employment Equality (Age Regulations) 2006 (the "Regulations") outlaw direct age discrimination (where a person (A) treats another person (B) less favourably than another on grounds of B's age) and indirect discrimination (where A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which he applies equally to others but which puts people of B's age group at a particular disadvantage and specifically does put B at that disadvantage). So, in the context of a redundancy scheme, if B is 30, to make a higher award to those over 40 would be directly discriminatory against B; and to use a higher multiplier for those with 10 years' service could also be indirectly discriminatory against B (because she is less likely to have been at work that long).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from