Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2025

A Different Mr Bates – But Another Important Lesson For Private Prosecutions

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

Whilst the saga of "Mr Bates v The Post Office" and the controversy regarding the abuse of private prosecutions continues to reverberate, the recent decision of The King...

United KingdomCriminal Law

Whilst the saga of "Mr Bates v The Post Office" and the controversy regarding the abuse of private prosecutions continues to reverberate, the recent decision of The King (on the application of Antony Bates) v Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court (District Judge Brennan) [2025] EWHC 184 (Admin) provides further salutary lessons. In quashing a summons for private prosecution, the High Court (HC) has provided an insight into some of the potential pitfalls of instigating such prosecutions and several helpful practice points for prosecutors and defendants alike.

Background

The summons was issued by Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court against the former Chief Financial Officer (AB) of Hibu plc (Hibu), who had been in post between 2010 and 2014, on the application of a former shareholder in Hibu (JW). In 2013, Hibu went into administration due to financial difficulties. In 2014, schemes of arrangement for Hibu's insolvency were approved in the HC Chancery Division.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from