The Gafta default clause: a closer focus
on mitigation
Sharp Corp Ltd -v- Viterra BV (formerly known as Glencore
Agriculture BV) [2024] UKSC 14
In this case, the Supreme Court has decided the proper measure
of damages under the Gafta default clause. Whilst the facts of the
case as presented are a little unusual, the Supreme Court's
conclusion provides guidance as to how damages are to be assessed
generally in cases of default under standard Gafta contracts. The
Court's focus is as much on the principle of mitigation as it
is on the compensatory principle.
The background facts
In summary, the chronology is as follows:
| January 2017 |
The parties concluded two contracts on C&FFO Mundra (India)
terms. One contract for the sale of 20,000mt lentils and the other
for 45,000mt yellow peas (the “Goods”). |