Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2009

Commercial Agents - An Update

Lawrence Graham LLP: Commerce & Technology
Explore more from Lawrence Graham LLP: Commerce & Technology

The recent Court of Appeal case of "Sagal v Atelier Bunz GmbH" held that an agent with the authority to contract (as opposed to simply an authority to negotiate) is only a commercial agent for the purposes of the Commercial Agents Regulations 1993 if they contract in the name of the principal.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Vanessa De Froberville
Vanessa De Froberville

The recent Court of Appeal case of Sagal v Atelier Bunz GmbH held that an agent with the authority to contract (as opposed to simply an authority to negotiate) is only a commercial agent for the purposes of the Commercial Agents Regulations 1993 if they contract in the name of the principal. The case is important confirmation of the definition of a "commercial agent". The Court looked at the documentation agreed between the principal and the agent as well as the agent and the customer; the two limbs of the definition of a commercial agent under the Commercial Agents Regulations 1993 (the "Regulations") and the actual business practice between the parties to determine whether an agent falls within the scope of the Regulations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from