Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2016

Strict Liability Under The Consumer Protection Act

The matter of Halstead-Cleak v Eskom Holdings Limited and some observations for liability insurers.

United KingdomConsumer Protection

The matter of Halstead-Cleak v Eskom Holdings Limited and some observations for liability insurers.

This article:

  • Examines a recent court decision which dealt with strict liability under the Consumer Protection Act;
  • Will be of interest to public liability insurers and brokers; and
  • Will also be of interest to design professionals and consultants and to their professional indemnity insurers and brokers, particularly in the design-build/construct contractual arrangement, and in the context of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Construction Regulations.

The Gauteng High Court, in the recent case of Halstead–Cleak v Eskom Holdings Limited [2015] JOL 33332 (GP), held that Eskom was "100% liable" to the Plaintiff who had been riding a bicycle and who, inadvertently, came into contact with a low hanging live powerline spanning a footpath, sustaining serious burn injuries in the process.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from